Making Tax Digital
Avona vs heavy accounting platforms: why simple does not mean basic
ONLY£15A MONTHCompare a focused MTD workflow with broader accounting platforms, using real business tasks, plan coverage and total service costs.

The right accounting software should make your next task clear. If you open it to record a customer payment and face a menu full of unfamiliar features, you may spend more time learning the system than doing the bookkeeping.
For a sole trader or landlord, that is a practical buying question. What do you need to do, how often do you need to do it, and how much explanation should the software require?
Avona.app focuses on a straightforward route from records to Making Tax Digital updates. The useful comparison with broader accounting platforms is about fit, rather than which product has the longest feature list.
Start with your business, not the software menu
A decorator working alone may need to collect payments, record materials and vehicle costs, review transactions and submit the required summaries. A landlord may need to identify rent, repairs, management fees and mortgage interest across a portfolio.
Neither automatically needs inventory management, a payroll system or a complex approval process. Another business might need all three.
Broad accounting platforms can be valuable because they support more activities as a business grows. Some also have products or plans intended for sole traders. It would be misleading to assume that every Xero or QuickBooks user runs a large company, or that those products are inherently unsuitable for smaller businesses.
Instead, compare the specific plan and workflow you would actually buy. A feature that you need is useful. A feature you never use can still add navigation, training or cost.
What MTD software needs to achieve
For an affected individual, the software setup must support digital records, quarterly reporting and the annual tax return process. The product or combination of products also needs to handle the person’s relevant income sources and accounting period.
These duties arise under the Income Tax digital obligations framework. An attractive dashboard is helpful, but it is not a substitute for correct records and supported submissions.
HMRC allows different software combinations and provides guidance on checking coverage. It also makes clear that recognition is not a recommendation of a provider. Read HMRC’s software selection guidance.
Your buying question is therefore: can this setup cover my actual tax position in a way I can use consistently?
Where Avona.app concentrates the work
Avona.app’s self-service proposition brings together bank feeds, statement and spreadsheet imports, transaction categorisation and MTD submissions. Avona AI helps organise transactions before you review them.
For someone whose main problem is a backlog of routine entries, that can be more relevant than a large collection of management features. The value lies in the sequence: bring in records, understand the categories, correct the exceptions and review the submission.
It should remain clear which information belongs to which business. A combined view of your finances can be useful, but a sole trade and a UK property business still need the appropriate reporting treatment.
Avona’s feature and pricing information describes the current plan coverage. Use it alongside your own task list rather than assuming that every capability is included in the core subscription.
A useful comparison table
The following compares approaches. It is not a feature audit of named competitors, whose plans and pricing need to be checked individually.
| Decision | Focused MTD workflow | Broader accounting workflow |
|---|---|---|
| Main purpose | Keep records organised and complete relevant MTD tasks | Support a wider set of financial and operational tasks |
| Setup priority | Income sources, imports, categories and submission coverage | Those items plus any additional modules and processes |
| Best reason to choose | Your recurring tasks are clear and relatively contained | You need the additional functions or integrations |
| Main question to test | Does it cover every part of your tax position? | Can you use the relevant functions without unnecessary effort? |
| Cost comparison | Check the core subscription and any required additional service | Check the specific plan, users, modules and introductory offers |
Simplicity is useful when it reduces effort while preserving the information you need. It becomes a limitation if it removes a function your business depends on.
Worked example: a decorator choosing a system
Consider Aisha, a sole trader decorator with one main bank account and around 60 monthly transactions. She has no employees or stock-management requirement. Some customers pay cash, and she buys materials occasionally on a personal card.
Her software test should include a realistic month of records. Can she import the bank transactions, add the cash receipts and identify the personal-card purchases without duplicating anything?
Next, she checks a mixed purchase. The supplier sells both business materials and household items. Can she understand and correct the category, and retain the explanation?
Finally, she reviews how the records become an MTD summary and who will handle the annual return. If the workflow feels clear and covers her needs, unused advanced modules do not make another product automatically better.
Now imagine Aisha hires staff, starts selling stocked products and needs detailed customer invoicing. Her requirements have changed. It is sensible to reassess the software or plan rather than treating simplicity as a reason to reject useful functionality.
What Avona AI can simplify
Repeated categorisation is a good place for assistance. Familiar supplier payments and recurring costs can be organised without making the same choice from scratch every time.
There are still exceptions. A payment description cannot prove business purpose, establish a private-use percentage or decide every repair-versus-improvement question. Your review provides that context.
Likewise, error checks can help identify things to investigate. They cannot guarantee that every omission or tax issue will be detected. HMRC’s business record guidance explains the underlying information you need to retain.
The strongest promise is that software makes records easier to organise and review. The submission may then be quick, but total compliance time will vary.
Compare the full price and service scope
Avona.app’s core self-service price is £15/month, equivalent to £180 a year if paid at that monthly rate throughout the year.
Do not assume this means every additional accounting feature or professional service is included. The current pricing page separates the core plan from additional functionality. Check the features you need before subscribing.
Professional support is a different purchase. Avona Concierge starts with a £60/month retainer + VAT, plus £15/month software: £75/month plus VAT on the retainer. The work included depends on the agreed service level.
When comparing any suppliers, check the ongoing price after introductory discounts, cancellation terms, data export and whether annual return preparation is included. Compare the work delivered, rather than a headline figure alone.
Use a small trial to answer the big question
Take a representative set of records and try the tasks you will repeat. Include one awkward transaction, one correction and the information your accountant needs.
Explore Avona.app if your priority is an accessible MTD workflow for £15/month. Check that it covers your circumstances and that the review process makes sense to you.
Good software makes the routine work easier while keeping the important decisions visible. That is a more useful measure of simplicity than the number of features on a comparison page.
Avona’s UK and foreign property and sole-trader quarterly support is ready; additional annual-return capabilities are in development. Check the Final Declaration feature matrix before relying on Avona for every section of your annual return.
